The Problem of Overextension:Analyzing America’s Black SeaPolicies through Jentleson’s 4 PsFramework


ÜLGÜL M., KÖSE İ.

Insigth Turkey, vol.24, no.1, pp.229-250, 2022 (ESCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 24 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2022
  • Doi Number: 10.25253/99.2022241.13
  • Journal Name: Insigth Turkey
  • Journal Indexes: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, IBZ Online, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, ABI/INFORM, Index Islamicus, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Political Science Complete, Sociological abstracts, vLex, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Page Numbers: pp.229-250
  • Keywords: American Foreign Policy, Black Sea, Clinton Administration, 4Ps Framework National Interests, STABILITY, STRATEGY
  • Karadeniz Technical University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Historically, the U.S. strategy in the Black Sea region has been stable, limited, and not ambitious as American administrations prioritized certain foreign policy objectives over other interests. This careful strategy was transformed during the Clinton Administration in the mid-1990s as the U.S. started following an extensive foreign policy framework, which included all American national interests, formulated by Bruce Jentleson in his 4Ps framework: power, peace, prosperity, and principles. The article argues that this transformation was problematic because of two obstacles –the illusion of the unipolar moment and the growing polarization in American domestic politics– which prevented the U.S. from following an effective policy in the Black Sea region.