Restless legs syndrome in patients with chronic low back pain


BAYKAL ŞAHİN H., KARACAOĞLU S., ÇAPKIN E., KARA F.

British Journal of Pain, cilt.17, sa.1, ss.23-27, 2023 (ESCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 17 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1177/20494637221119582
  • Dergi Adı: British Journal of Pain
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.23-27
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Low back pain, restless legs syndrome, Oswestry Disability Index, sleep quality, quality of life, INVENTORY, CRITERIA
  • Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

© The Author(s) 2022.Background: Based on studies showing that both chronic low back pain (LBP) and restless legs syndrome (RLS) have similar pathophysiological mechanisms, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of RLS in patients with chronic LBP and to define which demographic and clinical features are prominent in those with LBP accompanied by RLS. Methods: One hundred and two eligible, volunteer participants with chronic LBP were enrolled in this study. Visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Beck Depression Inventory, and Short Form-36 scales were applied to the patients. All patients were evaluated face-to-face for RLS using the International RLS study group diagnostic criteria. Results: Most of our patients were women (52%). The mean age was 40.96±13.34 years and the mean disease duration was 46.16±41.98 months. RLS was detected in 36 (35.3%) of the patients with LBP. It was found that the female gender was more dominant in patients with RLS and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The amount of coffee intake was significantly higher in patients with RLS compared to those without RLS (p = 0.001). The disease duration for LBP was significantly higher in the patients with RLS (p = 0.003). VAS score, ODI score, PUKI score, and Beck depression score were significantly higher in the RLS group (p value were 0.048, 0.040, 0.007, and 0.043, respectively). In the evaluation of quality of life, all parameters except role emotional limitations and mental health were found to be significantly worse in the RLS group.