Fractal dimension, lacunarity, and bone area fraction analysis of peri-implant trabecular bone after prosthodontic loading


Dundar N., Aslan E., Mutlu O.

Oral Radiology, cilt.41, sa.1, ss.120-130, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 41 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s11282-024-00784-0
  • Dergi Adı: Oral Radiology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.120-130
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Bone area fraction, Dental implant, Fractal dimension, Lacunarity, Panoramic radiography
  • Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objectives: To assess the structural alterations in peri-implant bone occurring 5 years after prosthodontic loading in panoramic radiography (PR). Methods: PR images of 44 mandibular and 33 maxillary implants along with 42 healthy control teeth taken before and 5 years after prosthodontic loading were included. Two regions-of-interest (ROI) were selected from mesial and distal surrounding bone of each implant and tooth. Then, the selected ROIs were divided to obtain three sub-ROIs (coronal, middle, and apical) on each side. A total of eight ROIs and sub-ROIs from each implant and control tooth were used for the calculations of fractal dimension (FD), lacunarity, and bone area fraction (BA/TA). The paired-sample t test was used to compare measurements before and 5 years after loading (p = 0.05). Results: Overall evaluation of 77 implants showed that FD decreased at the middle and apical peri-implant bone levels 5 years after loading (p < 0.05). In mandibular implants, BA/TA decreased after loading (p < 0.05). While FD decreased at the coronal level (p = 0.022), lacunarity increased at the middle level of mandibular implants (p < 0.05). In maxillary implants, FD decreased at the middle and BA/TA decreased at the coronal level (p < 0.05). On the other hand, BA/TA increased at the apical level of maxillary implants (p = 0.016) after loading. None of the parameters revealed any difference in the control group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: FD and BA/TA can be used to analyze structural changes in peri-implant bone after prosthodontic loading. Additionally, FD, lacunarity and BA/TA may provide useful information about changes occurring at different levels of peri-implant bone.