Investigation of the performances of advanced image classification-based ground filtering approaches for digital terrain model generation

Yilmaz V.

CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, cilt.33, sa.13, 2021 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 33 Sayı: 13
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1002/cpe.6219
  • Dergi Adı: CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Aerospace Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Computer & Applied Sciences, INSPEC, Metadex, zbMATH, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: digital terrain model, ground filtering, image classification, support vector machines, unmanned aerial systems
  • Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

The majority of the ground filtering techniques proposed so far use several user-defined parameter values. Since no standard protocols exist to define these parameters, obtaining the optimum filtering performance is very hard, especially in large-extent areas with abrupt topography changes. This, of course, reveals the necessity of some more efficient strategies to ease the ground filtering process in such areas. Utilizing classified images for ground filtering purpose may be of help to achieve this. Hence, this study, for the first time in the literature, investigated the performances of the state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms maximum likelihood (ML), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) in ground filtering of a UAS-based point cloud. The used approaches were based on the assignment of the points corresponding to the ground-related classes to the ground class. Evaluations showed that the SVM-based ground filtering approach achieved the optimum filtering result. The SVM-, ML-, RF-, and ANN-based ground filtering methods achieved the total errors of 13.2%, 16.4%, 19.6%, and 21.9% in the test site, respectively.