Modal Testing, Finite-Element Model Updating, and Dynamic Analysis of an Arch Type Steel Footbridge


Bayraktar A. , ALTUNIŞIK A. C. , Sevim B., Tuerker T.

JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, cilt.23, ss.81-89, 2009 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi) identifier identifier

  • Cilt numarası: 23 Konu: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2009
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2009)23:2(81)
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.81-89

Özet

This paper describes an arch type steel footbridge, its analytical modeling, modal testing, finite-element model updating, and dynamic analysis. A modern steel footbridge which has an arch type structural system and is located on the Karadeniz coast road in Trabzon, Turkey is selected as an application. An analytical modal analysis is performed on the developed three-dimensional finite-element model of footbridge to provide analytical frequencies and mode shapes. Field ambient vibration tests on the footbridge deck under natural excitation such as human walking and traffic loads are conducted. The output-only modal parameter identification is carried out by using peak picking of the average normalized power spectral densities in the frequency domain and stochastic subspace identification in the time domain, and dynamic characteristics such as natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratios are determined. The finite-element model of the footbridge is updated to minimize the differences between analytically and experimentally estimated modal properties by changing some uncertain modeling parameters such as material properties. Dynamic analyses of the footbridge before and after finite-element model updating are performed using the 1992 Erzincan earthquake record. At the end of the study, maximum differences in the natural frequencies are reduced from 22 to only 5% and good agreement is found between analytical and experimental dynamic characteristics such as natural frequencies and mode shapes by model updating. Also, maximum displacements and principal stresses before and after model updating are compared with each other.