Adaptation of Faux Pas Recognition Test Child Form to Turkish and investigation of psychometric properties


Sahin B., Sultan Onal B., Hosoglu E.

ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, cilt.21, ss.54-62, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 21
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5455/apd.6183
  • Dergi Adı: ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, EMBASE, Psycinfo, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.54-62
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: faux pas recognition, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, theory of mind, validity, reliability, ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER, ASPERGER-SYNDROME, SOCIAL COGNITION, EYES TEST, MIND, AUTISM, SCHIZOPHRENIA, METAANALYSIS, RELIABILITY, DEFICIT
  • Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Objective: This study aims to investigate the adaptation of Turkish version of Faux Pas Recognition Test Child Version (FPR) that evaluates affective and cognitive theory of mind skills, and the psychometric properties of the test. Methods: The sample of the study consists of 127 children aged 9-17 with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 97 children aged 9-17 with typical development. After four weeks, 49 children from the ADHD group and 83 children from the control group were retested. FPR, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) was applied to all participants. Test-retest method and Cronbach's alpha internal consistency analysis were used to evaluate the reliability of the scale. Correlation analysis was performed to check the external validity of the test. The ROC curve was used to evaluate its success in detecting the presence of ADHD. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between ADHD and control groups in terms of FPR and RMET scores (p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha internal correlation coefficient calculated to determine the reliability of the scale was found as alpha=0.78. Intraclass correlation coefficient for all three FPR scores was found to be above 0.8. When we evaluated the first and retest results, the concordance rate of all the stories was found to be above 0.7 (p<0.001). There was a positive correlation between FPR and RMET scores (r=0.461, p<0.001). The cut-off score of the scale was found as 15.5. Conclusion: These findings show that the Turkish version of the FPR child version has good psychometric qualities and can be used for further studies.