Evaluating pharmaceutical reverse logistics sustainability with a Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria approach
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, cilt.14, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 14
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3389/fenvs.2026.1862386
- Dergi Adı: FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, INSPEC, Directory of Open Access Journals, Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest)
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Introduction Pharmaceutical reverse logistics is essential for safe medicine take-back, regulatory compliance, and sustainability. However, selecting an appropriate reverse logistics model requires evaluating conflicting criteria under uncertainty.Methods This study proposes a two-stage Pythagorean fuzzy decision framework integrating PF-ITARA and PF-EDAS. Eighteen criteria were grouped into six sustainability clusters: economic, environmental, regulatory, operational, accessibility, and infrastructural. PF-ITARA was used to calculate criterion weights, and PF-EDAS was applied to rank four alternatives: third-party take-back, manufacturer-led returns, pharmacy-led collection, and government recycling centers.Results Processing/transportation cost was the most influential criterion, with a weight of 0.1264, followed by carbon footprint (0.0818) and storage cost (0.0809). Government recycling centers achieved the highest assessment score (0.507), followed by third-party take-back (0.496), pharmacy-led collection (0.491), and manufacturer-led returns (0.484). The maximum score difference among alternatives was 0.023, indicating close competition but a stable preference pattern.Discussion The proposed framework provides an auditable and threshold-sensitive tool for pharmaceutical reverse logistics decisions. The findings suggest that public recycling infrastructure may offer a more balanced option across cost, safety, environmental, and accessibility requirements, while also clarifying key cost-sustainability trade-offs for policymakers, manufacturers, and healthcare organizations.