Solvent‐Dependent GC–MS and LC–MS/MS Phytochemical Profiling of Echium italicum L. Aerial Part Extracts and In Vitro Enzyme Inhibitory and DNA‐Protective Effects


Gökkaya İ., Seyhan G., Güney E., Boğuşlu C., Yılmaz M. A., Barut B., ...Daha Fazla

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, cilt.40, sa.7, ss.70512, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 40 Sayı: 7
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1002/bmc.70512
  • Dergi Adı: BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), BIOSIS, Chemical Abstracts Core, Chimica, Compendex, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.70512
  • Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Echium italicum is a medicinal plant traditionally used in Türkiye for wound healing and inflammatory conditions. In this study,chloroform, ethyl acetate, ethanol, and 70% ethanol extracts prepared from the aerial parts were comparatively evaluated by gaschromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS), and theirin vitro antioxidant, enzyme inhibitory, and DNA interaction properties were investigated. LC–MS/MS profiling of the ethylacetate, ethanol, and 70% ethanol extracts revealed marked solvent-dependent differences in phenolic composition, with the70% ethanol extract containing the highest amounts of rosmarinic acid (8.858 mg/g), astragalin (4.551 mg/g), and nicotiflorin(3.874 mg/g). The GC–MS analysis showed that the primary constituents of the chloroform extract were 5-eicosene (25.30%),1-octadecene (19.82%), and octacosanol (14.85%). The ethyl acetate extract mainly included 9- octadecenoic acid methyl ester(35.11%), methyl palmitate (25.05%), and methyl stearate (11.35%). Among all tested extracts, the 70% ethanol extract exhib-ited the strongest 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity (78.10% at 200 μg/mL) and the highest α-glucosidase inhibition (61.45% at 200 μg/mL), whereas effects against α-amylase, tyrosinase, and elastase were weak. In agarosegel electrophoresis assays, the 70% ethanol extract did not induce DNA strand breaks and protected pBR322 plasmid DNA againsthydroxyl radical-induced oxidative damage. These results suggest that hydroethanolic extraction more effectively recovers phe-nolics linked to antioxidant, α-glucosidase inhibitory, and DNA-protective effects in E. italicum.