The role of enhanced process parameters on surface, microstructure, physical and mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg alloys manufactured by laser powder bed fusion


Beder M., Varol T., Akçay S. B., Aksa H. C., Güler O., Kocaman M.

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS, sa.49, ss.1-19, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.114413
  • Dergi Adı: MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Chemical Abstracts Core, Compendex, INSPEC
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-19
  • Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Aluminum alloys offer excellent opportunities for the development of additive manufacturing (AM) production as one of the key materials widely used in the aerospace and automotive industries. The AlSi10Mg alloy, which is of great interest due to its good machinability and relatively low cost, is one of the aluminum alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), the most widely used additive manufacturing (AM) techniques. In this study, 27 different AlSi10Mg alloys were fabricated by considering and varying the most important LPBF process parameters affecting the physical and mechanical properties of the produced parts and a systematic material characterization approach was used. Among the 27 samples, the samples with the best surface roughness characteristics were found to be samples coded S2, S11 and S20 with 100 W, 150 W and 200 W laser power, 30 µm layer thickness, 0.05 mm hatch spacing and 750 mm/s scanning speed, respectively. On the other hand, it was found that the optimum alloy parameters with the best physical and mechanical properties were those used in the production of the S11 coded specimen when the microstructure, Brinell hardness, micro hardness and density measurements of the S2, S11 and S20 specimens with the best surface properties were evaluated. The micro hardness value of sample S11 was found to be 141.4 ± 2.1 VHN, while the Brinell hardness value of the sample was determined to be 127.2 ± 1.9 BHN. It was found that the tensile strength (384.1 Mpa) of sample S11 was 95 % greater than that (196.8 MPa) of sample S2 and that the tensile strength was approximately 40 % greater than that (279.8 MPa) of sample S20.