Comparison of integrated force method and displacement method for metaheuristic optimization of civil structural systems


Creative Commons License

Torunoğlu İ., Daloğlu A.

4th International Civil Engineering & Architecture Conference, Trabzon, Türkiye, 17 - 19 Mayıs 2025, cilt.1, ss.2097-2108, (Tam Metin Bildiri)

Özet

Abstract. In the optimization process where metaheuristic methods are used, large number of structural analysis

is needed due to the nature of the methods. The most popular method used in structural analysis in civil

engineering is the finite element displacement method. In the displacement method, after the global stiffness matrix

is created, first the nodal displacements and then the internal forces of the elements are calculated. And these steps

are repeated in each iteration, depending on the optimization method used, and naturally requires longer time for

the analysis. Especially in structural systems with large number of elements, reducing analysis times can be an

advantageous. In order to benefit from this advantage, choosing different structural analysis methods appears as

an alternative. In this context, the performance of metaheuristic optimization methods combined with Integrated

Force Method for structural analysis have been investigated. In the Integrated Force Method, first the internal

forces of the elements and then the displacements of the nodes are calculated. Displacement method and Integrated

Force Method are compared in terms of section optimization based on Harmony Search Algorithm and Teaching

Learning Based Optimization. The obtained data show that the CPU times spent in the optimization processes

using Integrated Force Method are shorter than the times spent in the case of Displacement Method.