Integrating Technical, Socio-Economic, and Sustainability Dimensions for Spatial Stratification of Ecosystem Services Using the AHP Method


BAŞKENT E. Z., Başkent H.

Environmental Management, cilt.75, sa.10, ss.2777-2794, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 75 Sayı: 10
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00267-025-02224-z
  • Dergi Adı: Environmental Management
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, ABI/INFORM, Aerospace Database, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, EMBASE, Environment Index, Geobase, Greenfile, Index Islamicus, Metadex, Pollution Abstracts, Public Affairs Index, Veterinary Science Database, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2777-2794
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: AHP, ecosystem services, Forest management planning, forest stratification
  • Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Forest management is inherently complex, requiring a multi-dimensional approach to set management goals that balance the competing demands of ecosystem services, public expectations, and scientific-political considerations. This study addresses the necessity for recognising, prioritizing, and spatially stratifying ecosystem services (ES) based on technical suitability, stakeholder involvement, and the categories of sustainability within Turkey’s forest ecosystem management framework in Yalnızçam case study area. By leveraging Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods, particularly the Delphi technique with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), this research captures both scientific ground and perspectives of various sectors with a stratification model to determine ES provisions. The iterative framework includes ES identification and prioritization steps, culminating in their spatial stratification of forest stands with geographic information system. The results indicate that ES stratification highlighted the primary focus on biodiversity conservation (78.5%) and water protection (13.3%), with minimal provision for timber production (7.9%) and soil protection (0.04%), and none for climate regulation, eco-tourism, and non-wood forest products. This approach enables a more efficient spatial zoning strategy, balancing technical and socio-cultural factors, and streamlining decision-making processes crucial for sustainable forest management paradigm.