Evaluation of the Radiopacity of New Root Canal Paste/Sealers by Digital Radiography


TAŞDEMİR T., Yesilyurt C., Yildirim T., Er K.

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, cilt.34, sa.11, ss.1388-1390, 2008 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 34 Sayı: 11
  • Basım Tarihi: 2008
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.008
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1388-1390
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Digital radiography, radiopacity, root canal paste/sealers, GUTTA-PERCHA, FILLING MATERIALS, SEALING ABILITY, SEALER
  • Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The aim of the present study was to assess the radiopacity of new polydimethylsiloxane-based root canal filling paste (GuttaFlow; Coltene/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany) and resin-based root canal sealer (Adseal; Meta Biomed Co, Cheongju, Korea) and compare their radicipacity with three currently used root canal sealers (AH Plus [Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany], Epiphany [Pentron, Wallingford, CT], and Diaket [3M ESPE AG, Seefeld, Germany]) by means of direct digital radiography. Six specimens, 5 mm in diameter and 1 mm high, were performed for each material tested. After the material set, radiographs were made by using a digital sensor and a graduated aluminum stepwedge varying in thickness from 1 to 14 mm. These samples were tested according to the international standards to compare their radiodensity to that of the aluminum stepwedge. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey tests. The millimeters of aluminum values reported in this study were 10.41, 8.20, 6.50, 4.90, and 3.09 for AH Plus, Epiphany, Diaket, GuttaFlow, and Adseal, respectively. Although the materials evaluated had different radiopacities, all of them showed radiopacity above the minimum recommended by the International Organization for Standardization and the American National Standards/American Dental Association. (J Endod 2008;34:1388-1390)